|
Better yet - I'll ask the dumb questions and give you the answers.
Let's talk about how hot it was or wasn't in the WTC when the all the fuel set fire to the building? Being as no one was up there checking to see exactly how hot it was we'll never know.
But this kind of fuel doens't burn hot enough to take down a building? Great. Maybe - just maybe - it didn't. But I'm guessing the fact that a HUGE FUCKING AIRPLANE that CRASHED INTO THE BUILDING pretty much destroyed a fair percentage of the of the support the building had at that height. It is not possilbe that the fire combined with the HUGE FUCKING AIRPLANE THAT CRASHED INTO THE TOWERS didn't take down the building.
Well, I'm pretty sure that we've done a lot of testing on taking down tall buildings so someone should answer that. I mean, we fly airplanes into tall buildings all the time to test this, RIGHT?
Let's talk about how how the fire was. Aviatinon fuel burns at a certain temperture - we already know this. But how many dozens of extreme factors need to be figured in here?
What do I mean by "extreme factors"? Well, I'm gussing they know that aviation fuel burns at a certain temperture because they've set it on fire to test it. I mean, I'm sure they did this in a nice, well ventilated open space right? Big difference when you set it off with lots of shit that burns (desks, paper, wood, furniture, etc) in a tightly enclosed space (a building with a closed ventilation system) with a nice steady flow of oxygen created by four stories of one side of the building missing (from where the airplane came in).
|