Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix
dude..what i like is how top military buildings like the pentagon supposedly only have one camera angle..and its an outdated piece of shit from a 7 eleven or something.
hows that taste?
;)
or why 22 other videos have been taken away?
just questions you know....or why the light poles were not mangled..but rather they were just lying around close to where they had been anchored into the ground...youd think if a big ass plane hit a light pole the thing would be fucked up for one...and shot about 200 metres down the road
you know instead of lying on the ground besides where they came out...as if some tiny explosion cut the nuts and bolts and it just fell over from gravity
cause the lightpoles were in the only flight path possible if the guy the blame had flown it.
where the titanium engines?
does anyone even really remember the original story from the day?
watch old clips from that day...and then watch the story now.
|
When you go to your bank and you see security cameras on the outside of the bank, are they pointed at the building? Of course not - because they are mounted on the building.
Why is it an outdated peice of shit camera like you find in 7/11? Because the public would bitch if the Pentagon turned in a bill for $4mil to update it's security cameras?
Didn't the plane that hit the Pentagon take out a light pole? Or damgae it?
Were the light poles in the direct flight path of the plane? I've honestly never looked at a map so I would know. But even if they were light poles are only twenty feet high or so, and I'm guessing the airplane was higher than twenty feet when it passed, um, OVER the lightpole?
And.... I have no idea what this mean....
"you know instead of lying on the ground besides where they came out...as if some tiny explosion cut the nuts and bolts and it just fell over from gravity"