View Single Post
Old 08-05-2007, 06:38 AM  
pocketkangaroo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripshit View Post
Yes that video I have to agree has quite alot of debatable inaccuracies throughout but it also has some substantial facts that support there being an underhand in the morning of 911.
Keep in mind there are hundreds of these type videos surfacing now after this disaster.Those that point fingers in the same general direction.
The Facts in that video that I support I have highlighted in this thread.

Fact #6 The word trade center twin towers were designed to withstand multiple bowing 747s crashes and the one of the designers in the video has clearly stated this could have not brought them down.
Even if it could there would still be steel colums sticking straight up though the buildings afterwards!

Fact #7 There are several survivors of 911 that were in the bottom of the buildings that have clearly stated there was a huge explosion minute before the first plane hit.

Fact #8 These explosions were explosives used throughout the colums withing the buildings used to bring down the towers in combination with the planes.

Fact #9 A day after 911 building 7 of the world trade center fell.Why?
It was never hit by any planes and the footage of the buildings collapse clearly looks like a professional building demolition a common collapse from the middle in order to make the building fall into itself.
I'm not talking about the 9/11 stuff. I stopped after the Jesus part. While I'm an atheist, 90% of the crap in the first part was factually incorrect. Not debateable but just completely wrong.

My point being, if someone is going to makeup stuff to try and prove a point in one part of the video, why wouldn't they do it throughout the rest? They just have no credibility.
pocketkangaroo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote