Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

Of course the designer would say that, he built it and may have been liable to lawsuits. I also don't know how you could possibly test out scenarios like this and prove that it would be structurally sound to handle it, this is an unheard of occurence. And did the planes technically knock the buildings down, or was it the fact the burning jet feul compromised the building and made it fall.

In any case, the majority of structual engineers have agreed that the plane could knock the building down. I'll stick with their opinions.


And there are thousands of survivors who didn't hear a thing before the plane hit. Not to mention no calls to 911 after those pre-plane explosions. I'll take the opinion of thousands of people over several who probably got confused in the chaos.


I don't know how you can claim fact on something with no proof. Sure it can be your theory, but a few people saying they heard explosions is really not proof of anything. Find the explosives, find the people who put them there. It's the busiest building in New York, someone had to have spotted someone putting exploses on to the exposed steel (not an easy task).



You don't think that structural damage or the massive fires could have played a role in this? There was substantial damage to the building, and when that happens buildings fall. Shit, a fucking bridge just fell out of nothing the other day. And how come none of the thousands of firefighters and aid workers in the area didn't see any of this demolition take place?

The only fact in the video is that he liked about a lot of shit. If you lie about some stuff in the video, why would you believe any of it?