Originally Posted by Rochard

The section above the point of the plane impact had no support under it, it fell down on itself, and by the time the falling building came to a point where it did meet it support was it quickly (instantly) overwelmed. Of course the building fell on itself; How else is it supposed to fall? Just like sort of tip over or something? The top fell down on itself because their was no support under it. That's pretty simple.

I think it's wonderful that your questioning the government. However, to continue to hash over this for years and years with some of the dumbest questions is just getting old. When I can answer your questioning with statements that any freshmen high schooler can give you ("The building fell in on itself because it had no support underneath it"), well, it's time to give it a rest.

The US goverment gave you your answers - in the 9/11 Commission Report. Is it flawed? You bet your damn ass it is because everyone knows the government can't really do anything right, and on top of it's fault new things and new questions have come to light.

In order for any of this to have happened any other way means that hundreds of people must have been involved - people who planted explosives, who piloted or flew by the remote control that airplanes to the firefighters it the towers. I can answer all of your silly questions by saying "I'm pretty sure that someone would have come forward now".

I think it's just possible that some of you watch way too much fucking TV.