View Single Post
Old 01-28-2003, 09:26 PM  
JasonB
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,183
Quote:
Originally posted by The Truth Hurts


Did you actually click either link to listen to either of the two acceptable pronunciations?
Yes, I listened to them, but Webster's also says:
"We do not list the pronunciation of "nuclear" as \'nü-ky&-l&r\ as an "acceptable" alternative. We merely list it as an alternative. It is clearly preceded by the obelus mark \÷\. This mark indicates "a pronunciation variant that occurs in educated speech but that is considered by some to be questionable or unacceptable." A full description of this can be found in the Guide to Pronunciation on our website at http://www.m-w.com/pronguid.htm. We are definitely not advocating that anyone should use the pronunciation \'nü-ky&-l&r\ or that they should abandon the pronunciation \'nü-klE-&r\. "



Why Does Bush Go "Nucular"

Webster's Response

You'll also notice that m-w.com lists things like "eksetera" as a pronunciation of "etcetera". ...just because people say it... not because it is correct.

Last edited by JasonB; 01-28-2003 at 09:35 PM..
JasonB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote