View Single Post
Old 08-29-2007, 04:00 PM  
c-lo
Confirmed User
 
c-lo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: On search pages, on ICQ @ 308 7 43669, and in the U.S.
Posts: 925
Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex View Post
c-lo, in the end, your intial point about few CP producers getting stopped as a result if the main reason why the secondary producer clauses can (and likely will) be challenged in court. Similar to COPA and COPAII, the law doesn't further the stated intent of the law (stop child abuse), and further it does it in the most abusive and most labor intensive method possible.
So should I leave it in? I agree they'll probably be challenged on that, so I hate to give warning (although I'm pretty sure they've already thought of it.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex View Post
Your comments are spot on!
I've noticed we're usually on the same page.

EDIT: Also changed rapsheet to rap sheet, so don't recommend correcting that anyone.
__________________
The AlphaPhaze Network
Traffic & Hardlink Trades | Sponsors | Resources
The adult marketing network you can trust

Last edited by c-lo; 08-29-2007 at 04:02 PM..
c-lo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote