Quote:
Originally Posted by StuartD
I don't really have time to be making examples.... I barely have time to revisit this thread from time to time. Besides, you seem pretty convinced and can't be told otherwise anyway.
However, suffice to say... there are differences. Otherwise they wouldn't have bothered making the doctypes in the first place. Right?
There's plenty of examples, tutorials, descriptions and so on with a few quick searches in Google... for example: http://htmlfixit.com/tutes/tutorial_...ferences.shtml |
Yes, there are differences. Differences in how the code is written, not in how a layout will be displayed in a browser. Seriously, I'm beginning to wonder if you even do know the true differences between each doctype.
It's sad you can't admit you're wrong. You were all about me being the stupid one at first, but as soon as I go a bit more in depth and provide some examples you back off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by StuartD
You can continue to make pages designed with tables if that's what works for you, but CSS is still a better method. Or you can use CSS and not bother with DOCTYPES if that's what works for you, but using proper DOCTYPES is still a better method.
|
Seems to me you're the one using CSS and not using proper doctypes. Since you're so naive to doctypes and how they effect a page. I truly wonder if you realize what each one is designed for and how using different ones can benefit different types of web pages.