Quote:
Originally posted by CDSmith
And a maintenance engineer is still a janitor.
For the record, I don't like forced sex depictions either. Not at all. However, I understand that the actors are all mostly consensual about it, and being paid rather well for the most part, but that's not the point. The point is that some people do like to view that sort of thing, and whose to thumb their nose at them for having those interests? Where do well allow the line of censorship to be drawn? I'm telling you, start censoring content like Easton's and the pro-censorship assholes will then come calling for sites like Kiko's. If you think they'll stop, you're out to lunch.
Same thing with people who promote, produce, or like to watch horror-fantasy-gore-goth-death shit and other extreme niche stuff. People have fantasies, and other people deliver the goods to them. Big deal. It's called the law of supply and demand.
Calling others that promote other genres that you may not agree with "bottom feeders" is what is unproductive for this industry. Let's try and mind our own stores and respect the rights of others instead of fingerpointing.
Now, if women were truly being abused against their will that's another story entirely. But until that happens, live and let live.
|
Yeah but feeding the fantasy when the fantasy itself is illegal...is moraly wrong.... and might be soon simply illegal.... Thats why it can hurt the biz...
Fake rape sites, fake CP sites... nobody is directly harm but it just feed a wrong fantasy... And that can be dangerous...
An by being legal, it also has a desensitization effect... ( they think it no big deal..)