Quote:
Originally Posted by dig420
yeah, that's what all the columnists who depend on online poker for a living say. As if you have to be a moron to even consider the notion.
I say that's bullshit, you'd have to an idiot not to suspect it, and the absolutepoker bullshit proves it. If you're still spouting that line after all this, you're just not thinking straight.
|
I have played close to 250K hands on line at various levels...my roomate plays $100-$200 + online every day and we don't seem to be having any problems.
She is also pretty tight with many of the online companies, in fact was tied very closely to Party Poker and helped them get started.
now, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying there has never been any collusion or multi-accounting, I know for a fact there has.
However, the whole thing about rigging poker so fish suck out on better players because they will more than likely put the money back into the rake machine vs better players taking it off line is bullshit.
Or the whole set up weird turn and river cards to create more rake etc., these "theories" have mostly been perpetuated by those who can't beat the game, and instead of looking themselves, look outwardly for an excuse.
The level of programming needed to create such programs to deliver suckouts...LOL
The simple fact is only a relatively small % of people are good enough to beat the game, a slightly larger % break even, and the rest, are for lack of a better word, losers.