Quote:
Originally Posted by PBucksJohn
My program isn't very successful. It exists more so I have a place to test certain new things without screwing up a client and so I can keep a pulse on what is going on in the biz from the program owners point of view. It is a test bed 10 fold more than a money maker.
That said, I don't know why you claim to know how big our clients are and that so many have 100 members tops.
Many affiliates prefer NATS because they can get what they want quickly and easily and they are familiar with it. This will be even more relevant once v4 is released in the coming months.
This goes for big and small affiliates.
I think MPA has done a good job of fixing their image over the past few years and I think their product is improved. I hope they keep improving it as it drives me to make sure NATS stays one step ahead.
As you said and as I said before. Not every peg fits in every hole. My personal feelings aside I'm sure MPA is a better solution for some people. IMO the NATS peg just fits in many more holes comfortably.
To each his own.
|
Yeah I agree I wasn't trying to say anything negative about your clients
and how many members they have.....anyone can figure that out looking
at those programs and see how they're doing.....
also didn't mean anything with mentioning your own sites....I could have
said your business whatever it is.....I don't know why you keep thinking
I have something against you or your business.....coz I don't I actually
tried to say.....NATS is amongst the best what's available....only thing
I said there's not 1 BEST for everybody which is obvious and not negative
in any way and yes without any competition it wouldn't be as good as it
is today.....
