Quote:
Originally Posted by PBucksJohn
I'm about to get on a plane so I'll have to keep this short.
But since you brought up the shaving thing in such detail. Its not the fact of can or can't shave. Its the fact of encouraging and aiding and assisting shaving vs. taking the opposite approach of being 110% against it.
Those who can't see the difference on that confuse me.
edit: as far as your comment about the fact that you should not blindly look at the software a program is using but rather you should look at the people behind it I agree 100%. You should also look at the people who work for them, the people who own and work for their host, who they process with, and who is behind the software and services they use (affiliate software, content, etc.) as well.
|
John, I absolutely agree with you here. And we all know that if either company / software at this point in time would be caught aiding the program owners in making shaving possible or easy it would mean the DOOM of their entire business and I can wholeheartedly say that that is not what we want.
It is the longevity of our business that is interesting and wanting to be in business for many years to come that makes it well worth the while to ensure that a software like MPA3 or any competitor alike keeps a completely clean line of business.
Companies choose a software for is dependency and reputation, features and support - it should be the KEY factor to check into this before making a decision on which software and company to go with.
We took a very firm stand on this years ago and have never looked back. Here is an example I think people should know about and take to heart:
http://www.xbiz.com/news/news_piece....&mi=all&q=mpa3
