Quote:
Originally Posted by Oystein
John, I absolutely agree with you here. And we all know that if either company / software at this point in time would be caught aiding the program owners in making shaving possible or easy it would mean the DOOM of their entire business and I can wholeheartedly say that that is not what we want.
It is the longevity of our business that is interesting and wanting to be in business for many years to come that makes it well worth the while to ensure that a software like MPA3 or any competitor alike keeps a completely clean line of business.
Companies choose a software for is dependency and reputation, features and support - it should be the KEY factor to check into this before making a decision on which software and company to go with.
We took a very firm stand on this years ago and have never looked back. Here is an example I think people should know about and take to heart: http://www.xbiz.com/news/news_piece....&mi=all&q=mpa3
 |
I only disagree with you when you say "at this point in time". IMO being caught doing so at any point in time is relevant.
I understand you now have a stand against it and I am glad to see it. However, I see you doing so as a business decision. To me it is more of a moral issue. It's really as simple as right vs. wrong and goes back to what was mentioned earlier that if you make more money with sponsor A and they shave then that is ok.
To me, it isn't. I'd rather make a lesser, fair dollar amount with sponsor B than use someone who is cheating me just because I make a few extra dollars now. Sponsor B will be a much more lucrative relationship in the long run.