Quote:
So fucking what if he is unelectable?
Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Barack Obama, why would I even leave my house to vote for one of them? None of them come remotely close to representing my views. All represent big government and government intervention to solve all problems. Higher taxes, deficit spending, repression of economic freedom, repression of personal freedom, I don't feel compelled to trade one for the other, nor do I think debating a trade off is worth a moment of my time.
All of this "Ron Paul Conspiracy" is beyond silly. If you support the war in Iraq, balancing the budget by raising taxes, and so on, fine. I am not going to question your intelligence. Plenty of smart, sensible people will vote for Clinton, Giuliani, Romney, Obama and so on.
But, if you actually believe that a tiny core group of Ron Paul elitists have conspired to make him appear popular, your an idiot. The fact is he represents a viewpoint that many Americans feel very strongly about -- and no other candidate, Republican or Democrat comes close to fulfilling.
As for protest vote -- yes. I want things to be as uncomfortable as possible for smooth talking flip flopper and panderers who don't really believe anything.
|
huh? what the hell are you talking about?
i dont think this... think that... or think the other thing.
i simply think i see a guy who is so obviously a bad candidate for president, who has zero interest in working with government, who cant lead government and a bunch of morons who think that makes total sense.
you morons are totally unreal.
must be nice. mickey mouse can declare his candicy on the platform of just wanting to make people more happy and it seems there will be no shortage of idiots informing the rest of the world on mickey's behalf, that they are "misinformed" for "not getting it"
the rest of the voting public cares about health care, falling dollar, iran, iraq, n. korea, trade deficits, taxes, debt etc etc etc... and a candidate that can be an effective president.