Quote:
Originally Posted by milan
We respect first and foremost OUR customers, I have no problem with that do you? and if you saw the post we had a few months back you will see we did alerted the industry but I guess the subject of the post was not appealing enough for people to ask Q's.
|
I'm sorry but with an issue this big and TMM's response I would have found a few different ways to bring this to light. There are many posters who would of posted it for you without naming you as the source, there's opening a new GFY account and bouncing an old thread with new in depth info and there is finding a list of big NATS users you're not hosting and giving them a Heads up.
You backed off because John threatened legal action to your clients. Which is partly understandable, reflects badly on John as he must of known the last place he would go with this is court.
John I see you are still calling people names. If you're 101% innocent in this you're a bad businessman. Because the problem was shown to you and instead of fixing it and informing clients you chose to hide it and threaten VICTIMS with court action.
The problem continued, with your knowledge. Or did you not believe all the warning signs that were being shown to you while you were threatening people with court action?