Quote:
Originally Posted by GreyWolf
Depends on the future scenario with a claimed EU corp shunga and possibly to a degree on the alleged "partnership relationship".
Simple and far more clean cut is for Sticky Incorporated to have their own EU corp and presence and under their control. This kinda stuff always ends up messy, but, as you say, for better or worse, it can be a good thing to have another party handling EU processing (based on past track record).
It's far nicer to be "clean" and above board - and can save a hell of a lot of problems.
|
Just shut your ignorant piehole already.
