Originally Posted by Kevsh

That's one way to look at it ... or, what really happened:

Bush (via the CIA) said there was WMD.
Then, Inspectors found no WMD.
Saddam caught and interrogated, says he claimed he faked WMD.

None of Bush's claims were made based on his interrogation (they were made long before), and was entirely based on faulty "intelligence" that had nothing to do with faked evidence, from Saddam or otherwise.

So how does that get Bush off the hook?
Plus, the decision to go into Iraq was made long before they "found" WMD. This was verified both by George Tenet and Bob Woodward's books on the subject. Clearly, the Bush administration was going to "find" WMD one way or another to support their policy to overthrow Saddam.

So clearly, not one Liberal "wacko" has anything to apologize for. Bush and his Administration lied, period, and *none* of the reasons they went into Iraq were based on Saddam's faked WMD.