Quote:
Originally Posted by lot
And only the really niche lovers and ppl who have enough knowledges can estimate the site correctly for the surfers. I'm talking about not a mainstream sites, but the niche sites, where the key point is not a quantity.
|
Well, in the end, a large part about rating sites is subjective. For me, I think that in order to get the most out of reviews from a surfers and site owners perspective, you can't look at the exact numbers. Having someone ask why their site got an 75 vs another site getting an 78 isn't productive. The idea is to look at the site and score in a general sense. And I'm not sure a skilled reviewer who just does shemales will necessarily give a better review over someone who has done a similar number of reviews, but in different categories.
One thing you can't score for when it comes to adult content is taste. That applies to all levels, be it taste in production values, models and/or scenarios. As long as a reviewer can stay objective about matters of taste, and the criteria is similar, there shouldn't be much of a difference in the reviews, no matter what nice they specialize in. When it comes to taste, as you say, the key point is no longer quantity in most cases.
People just want to see what they want to see. By cataloging as many sites by niche as we can, hopefully people will be able to find exactly what it is they're looking for. A higher score just means they'll see those sites first. Taste will take care of whether they convert or not.