GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - Mass demonstrations in favor of Saddam Hussenin

Probono · 02-16-2003, 11:25 AM

For all my opinion is worth I need to add it.

I am on the fence regarding this war. I was a very active anti war organizer in the Vietnam war era but this is different.

I wonder why I cannot remember any anti war demonstrations when US and European forces deployed to help the Muslims in Bosnia? Where there demonstrations?

Why is it that Saddam Hussan's genocide is different then Serbia's genocide of Muslims.

I am a bit confused. What I do believe is that Saddam has hidden vast amounts or chemcial and bilological agents. Saddam has a missile system that has a longer range then allowed by the UN. this from Hans Blix not GW Bush. Saddam has not complied with UN resolution 1441 which put the obligation on him to prove he disarmed. Instead weapons inspectors need to chase around Iraq looking for weapons.

I agree with Bill Clinton Saddam has weapons, he might not be a clear and present danger to the US but his weapons put into the hands of terrorists are.

I think giving the UN more time is a political necessity but they will not ever find anything Iraq does not want them to find.

I think this will end up with many people dying the question is should it be innocent victims of cheical or biological weapons released in some city in Europe or the US or should it be the leadership of Iraq?

02-16-2003, 11:25 AM
Probono Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Under the Rainbow Posts: 2,731	For all my opinion is worth I need to add it. I am on the fence regarding this war. I was a very active anti war organizer in the Vietnam war era but this is different. I wonder why I cannot remember any anti war demonstrations when US and European forces deployed to help the Muslims in Bosnia? Where there demonstrations? Why is it that Saddam Hussan's genocide is different then Serbia's genocide of Muslims. I am a bit confused. What I do believe is that Saddam has hidden vast amounts or chemcial and bilological agents. Saddam has a missile system that has a longer range then allowed by the UN. this from Hans Blix not GW Bush. Saddam has not complied with UN resolution 1441 which put the obligation on him to prove he disarmed. Instead weapons inspectors need to chase around Iraq looking for weapons. I agree with Bill Clinton Saddam has weapons, he might not be a clear and present danger to the US but his weapons put into the hands of terrorists are. I think giving the UN more time is a political necessity but they will not ever find anything Iraq does not want them to find. I think this will end up with many people dying the question is should it be innocent victims of cheical or biological weapons released in some city in Europe or the US or should it be the leadership of Iraq?