|
Paul's tube site stance is pathetic ..... no argument there.
When the website in question was sold was there no "due diligence" done? Content and traffic are the obvious assets being purchased. For the buyer to pay for content that wasn't transferrable is a bad investment. For the seller to sell something not his, over-stating assets, might be something to ask an attorney about.
To call Paul after a server crash and expect his cooperation is wishful thinking and foolish.
|