Originally Posted by Quickdraw

Whatever the case with the buying and selling of the sites in question, is irrelevant at this stage in this matter.

Sure, Pornonada should/could have been more careful with his purchase, and he readily admits that. As they could not come to terms when trying to get the 'license' straightened out, Pornonada decided they should remove the content. At least this is the way I see that it went down.

Technically, Paul is right in this matter, but his handling of the situation was completely out of line. (Note that NONE of the other content providers for the sites in question had any problem restoring content, etc.)

Paul was unreasonable with his request to be removed from the shitlist. If all it takes is a little bit of trading/cash to get removed from a shitlist, then the shitlist means nothing.

Calling the guy a scammer and pirate was completely unfounded and a blatant lie, as the details have been discussed publicly for some time.

With as many prices and wants that Paul has requested concerning this it just shows that he is quite selective for who and how his 'license' is applied.