View Single Post
Old 02-24-2008, 12:23 AM  
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
look i for one don't fault him for working with the tube sites as long as they comply with DMCA request they are operating within the law

however smokincash is a corporation, it pays it affiliates from a corporate account. that corporation ownes the domains, and the entire program was bought lock stock and barrel

which means the liciencee did not change, it still the same corporation that bought the licience in the first place.

who owns the corporation which owns the licience should not matter, and based on the wording of the contract it does not.
The original license was never sold to a company, it's to an individual who does not have the license or never showed it to to Pornonada. That license allows the licensee to use it on his domains.

It is not to a corporation, it's not to domains and it clearly states it's not transferable by the licensee. Where did you get that it was sold to a corporation?

So he bought the content he can't buy, as the original buyer does not have "content" to sell, he then uses the content, he still uses the content after he knows it's not licensed to him, he breaks the original terms of the license, he never paid for the extra use of the license.

He then starts a thread to damage my business. He should of called it.

"Don't buy a license from Paul Markham because the old fool will expect you to stick to it."

I know I rub people up the wrong way. I am me take it or leave it. But please don't make posts accusing me of doing something wrong when you clearly do not know the facts. Just to emphasise the facts.

1. The original license is to a person not a company.
2. It's not to be sold or transferred by that person.
3. It was for members are use only, it's being given to affiliates.
4. Pornonada has never seen the license.
5. Pornonada has not obtained a transfer of the license to him.
6. Pornonada continued to use the content.
7. Pornonada claims he sold the company and the content again.

The license has been broken time and time again, yet I'm meant to suck it up and ignore it. And take the flaming for getting pissed off.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote