Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian Sands
he didn't steal the content, so you're already wrong there. He bought a cash program and for some reason there was a misunderstanding if the license was transferable with the domain. Seems it is not, now go work it out.
Seems like you just try to make a few extra bucks real quick. why do you care if a guy named Joe owns the site or a guy named john? Explain that to me.
|
OK there was misunderstanding. He bought a program and was sold content that the seller did not own to sell. OK accepted at this point.
I told the seller, called Marcel, before the sale he is not allowed to sell the license. Told him on ICQ to send the new buyer to me and not too include the license in the sale. Maybe Marcel is the biggest culprit here.
When Pornonada lost the content, he did not lose it all as he has it in his affiliates are and tour, he asked me to give it to him again and rewrite the license. This was the first I heard of it. I tried to make some extra money. Shoot me down in flames.
All the time Pornonada was using it in his affiliates area which is clearly against the terms of the license and without paying for the extra use. So he was also trying to make some extra money, shoot him down in flames.
If the content is in the affiliates area it's in there in clear breech of our license. That is something I would like to be paid for, do you think that's fair?
However we only have Pornonada word he bought the license to the content and the seller lost it during the transfer, the seller lost it off his computers and the servers? Might of happened.
Maybe the seller is not the guilty party, maybe he did not sell the license on the content and never transfered it to Pornonada, except for the bits he was using in the affiliates area.
Maybe Pornonada can show us he bought the license for the content.