Quote:
Originally Posted by Axeman
Actually he is getting less than 50% of democrats in voting so far, but is winning with the help of getting independent and republican votes to put him over the top. And in the south was pushed over by massive % of the AA vote.
If Clinton can win Ohio and TX or stay close in TX due to their primary then caucus thing, then a true test of what the Democrats themselves want will be in Pennsylvania where it is a closed primary where indy's and republicans can not vote in the democratic side.
|
You misunderstood what I said. I meant he was the current top dem canidate and winning overall. AND that the dems were currently winning with 60-70% of the votes.
So. 4 canidates, two dems. Obama the current top dem canidate, and winning overall. And dems winning over repubs with about 60-70% of the votes.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/
Honestly, I could care less who has gotten the most votes from the dem associated party. Because that doesn't matter in the end. And I can't stand one sided party members to begin with.