Quote:
Originally Posted by cykoe6
I agree. I thought Nats received a great deal of unfair criticism form a certain person but a refusal to respond to even reasonable inquires makes it seem like they are hiding something. Rushing to get Will76 banned for politely inquiring into the issue raises even more doubts. As an affiliate I also resent the repeated implication that only programs who purchase Nats have a legitimate interest in the issue as opposed to affiliates who are supposed to trust in the integrity of the software.  |
The security issue was just as much of an issue for affiliates as it was for program owners. I'd like anyone to show me where I've said otherwise as I don't believe. If I ever have, I was wrong, but I really don't see that as something I'd ever say as I don't believe it to be true. You have as much interest in it as people who run NATS.
I have no problem answering questions about it, any questions, I'm just tired of doing it here with dozens of fake nicks, trolls, etc. running around. And it was gone about in totally the wrong fashion in that thread. If something is so important to you and you're wondering about it for months you don't dive into a special offer thread with it. I'm easy to contact. It hasn't been the first time he's given me a hard time either. I didn't go running to Eric right away, inf act I didn't even mention Will to Eric until the next day when he tried to start an anonymous drama thread about my company. I guess jumping into the first thread with drama wasn't enough for him.
The check was fedexed out to Webmaster Toy Run today btw.
Again, I am more than happy to answer any questions from NATS users or affiliates. I'm just done doing it here. It just ends up wasting time with people who aren't even in this biz or fake nicks, etc. If you are an affiliate still feel free to contact me. I'm more than happy to discuss it with you.