Quote:
Originally Posted by PBucksJohn
I'm not going to sit here and search for his postings, the search here is not exactly the most effective. You said in your post he said a couple things. He's said more than a couple.
I'm sorry you feel I'm a "jack ass" and an "idiot". You've made it clear you didn't like the handling of the security issue a number of times.
It didn't take 8 months to pay. It took a few months to finally pick a winner, and then the ball was dropped on getting the check out. There were never any ill intentions or "lies" about it as he accused me of. It doesn't matter if the post named us or not. It was the intent of the post. It came from his being pissed off as was explained above.
And again, as above, my reply to him when he asked about it was polite and direct. He just didn't like the answer so he went off.
You're not adding anything new here, you're just rehashing the same points which have been addressed already.
|
It seems kind of wrong that will gets the shut up button but you get to continue on tossing more logs on the fire, no? I'm not taking sides here, when Eric says it's time to cool down then it's probably a good idea to cool things down, and that's one of Will's faults I suppose. But shouldn't it apply to everyone directly involved?
At the end of the day Will appears to have made some valid points, as have you, but the problem at your end is that you choose to defend defend defend instead of at least conceding the odd point and admitting that maybe there have been some mistakes made at your end. And frankly it's not looking good on you.
No attitude here, no 'tone', so please don't read any into my post. Thanks.