Quote:
Originally Posted by Gouge
Do you even know the difference between occupation and liberation?
I guess the improvements of a bi-partisain bi-tribal run goverment, Iraqi constitution and bill of rights, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, free enterprise, voting for the first time since 1979, freedom of education and the extra bonuses of hospitals, markets, entertainment squares and there oil incoming being put back into the countries infrastructure dosent count as any kind of freedom for anyone in Iraq?
I will always be free man because im American. If China landed 200k in troops in the US it would be an act of war not liberation. And being a citizen soldier i would take up arms and defend the county, my family and any other American as best i could.
And its koolaid, not coolaid...
|
and ask her how he freedom is great :
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7308393.stm
The only part you are right is that the so called " liberation " was an
act of war ...
Nazis ( since you are such a specialist of WWII, and want to bring that in the subject ) had the same view as you .. they were " liberating " ..
.. and even thne US media doesn't refer to the military operation as liberation, but as invasion ....
BTW, in your case, it is
Coolaid ....
and ask her how the freedom is great :
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7308393.stm