Quote:
Originally posted by Gemini
So you describe the "employee" as a sub-contractor... and NOT an employee or francisee.
Hence, if legal troubles develop due to running a "branch" of your company the "sub-contractor" is on his/her own. lol The line about your attorney was subterfuge to cloud someones mind.
Yet the fee's... those ARE franchise related. You can't have both under most state laws. Sub-contractors paying a "fee" is paying for the rights to do the work........
|
Great point. He probably can't have it both ways legally.
If I'm not mistaken, he's in California. And California has some of the toughest laws on this kind of thing.
But I think it's pretty obvious he doesn't care much about the law anyway.