View Single Post
Old 04-27-2008, 05:41 PM  
peeperpimp
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pimpin On The NET!!!
Posts: 5,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by stickyfingerz View Post
Must have proof. He said she said situations should be excluded.
But then again for a long time everyone was using cheater hell and no one gave a fuck about any of this, anyone could blacklist anyone else without proof...

and the person blacklisted wouldn't have a clue as to who put him there...

So in my opinion names are unnecessary as long as the option to reput the statement is available , how ever names would be helpfull as far as talking to the other person in hopes of some how getting them to recant their statement...

so I say let the individual decide when they add a comment as to whether or not they have the balls to show their name and say "ya I said it "

If the accusation your makeing is true, then why not show your name?

Names yes, as an option

Thats my 2 cents
__________________
ICQ: 377517467
peeperpimp (at) yahoo (dot) com

Last edited by peeperpimp; 04-27-2008 at 05:43 PM..
peeperpimp is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote