Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienQ
Basically the way the government see's marriage is nothing more than an investment in hopes that a married couple have children.
Gay couples do not create children and therefore should not be entitled to the benefits as the government see's it.
|
Of course your argument has no merit because there is no fertility requirement for marriage. Barren women who have had a hysterectomy and men who have all testicles removed can get married. In Arizona, first cousins can marry if they can prove that at least one is infertile or over the age of 65. Those people who will never have children can get married.
Damn - maybe we should just go back to traditional marriage rules, like in the bible where a man could have as many wives as he could afford, and marriages were arranged by the parents.