View Single Post
Old 06-11-2008, 04:46 AM  
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
piracy is good made one mistake and that was to fail to take the concept of product placement into account. His proposed business model failed to take root (i know i was involved in one such attempt) because advertisers get the same benefit (not only for the bit torrent distributed content but for all distributions) as his logo bugs from product placement.

However the key point about alternative revenue streams is 100% valid, and the explosion of product placement in tv shows last year is proof of that.

Just because coke and pepsi would not want to advertise in your porn movie does not mean that their are no product placement oppertunities. there are 100, if not 1000s of potential advertisers. A couple of good product placements within a scene could cover the entire production cost.

You of all people should be harolding the change because as a content shooter you can reap the maximum benfit, by discounting the cost of producing the content via product placement.
Eva and I went around the Berlin Venus show and spoke to Lube, Sex Toys and a few others. They would not give us a free sample, which costs a few dollars, in the exchange for us putting it in a movie and giving them the scene.

Product placement works in mainstream Will AFF place their product in our movies and pay for it? I'm thinking along different lines though.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote