Originally Posted by Tempest

I completely agree.. I've got big tit traffic to send but this entire thing stinks.

Reading between the lines, here's what I think has happened... WM1 had a contract with her to have content of her on a site... I've read a few of these solo girl contracts and the vast majority aren't worth shit... I have a strong feeling that the contract does not state that the site will be her "official" site and I doubt it had any wording that she was locked in for the duration of the contract to NOT be able to open another site in her name or to shoot content for another site that bares her name.. I also suspect that it probably is in force for a couple more years but is poorly written such that they can continue to run the site with her likeness and content for that time frame.. The one thing I'm not sure about though is whether or not her 50% revenue from the site is also in force for that time frame.. WM1 seems to indicate it is, but she said it isn't.. So one of them is lieing.

I suspect there are lies on both sides (more so on her part than MPs)... As part of all this, MP should have seen her previous contract by now and yet they have not said anything about it. If they haven't, then that's just crazy.. Even IF she's lost her copy or something, she should be able to get a copy, or a lawyer should be able to easily get a copy as well. However, given MP isn't taking legal action, I suspect a lot of what WM1 has said about his contract is true. Given WM1 isn't taking legal action, I suspect my analysis of their contract is close to being accurate as well. Although from their end of things it doesn't seem to be worth the effort.

As After Shock Media said, what she says on a video tape means squat. At this point, I for one need to see some concrete proof. Hell, I'd be willing to sign a non-disclosure to review both contracts for myself so I knew which to promote.