|
I do not think it is necessary to keep face stomping VS at this point. THey revised there TOS, they discussed the problem with Chrome and reinstated Chrome.
I really do not think it is necessary to continue to berat VS
VS got the balls to change themselves over this matter rather than have pride over come them. It was a mature thing to do and most importantly manned up to fixing the error in front of everyone here.
Many of you goto admit 9 times out of 10 no one mans up in this business and admits mistakes, nor puts an effort to correct a problem, they usually run off to the sunset with a handful of money doing flip off signs the whole way.
VS has been here since a little after I started in this business and the whole time they been playing the field they have done outstanding business, they retain and entertain audiences that keep recurring.
You can use Chromes case in this as an example. The guy sent a client to them many many many years ago and he still collects money. I can not think of many programs doing that for webmasters as most companies are here and gone in this business within 5 years.
I applaud VS for changing things around even if it was a bad bad call they still changed to fix the situation.
If you think they bowed just because of board pressure think again. I thought it was the beginning of an exit strategy for VS. The termination of Chrome was significant for more reasons than just Chrome alone. It signified a possible exit plan which bothered me more. I figured Chrome was to be the first of many.
Because in my conspiracy Not only chrome would have been cut but many others as VS would attempt to shore up income before closing shop. Obviosuly VS is not going that route by reinstating Chrome.
So think about it.
|