Quote:
Originally Posted by axc
Apparently people are not reading the start of the thread...
I did send a nice polite letter with compliance options and 72 hour response window. It was not responded to until it went to the next step, notify hosting providers. We initially even considered re-licensing the content, but decided against it once we determined how widespread the abuse was, in our opinion.
If anyone is in the right to sue over this issue, it's Asian XXX Content.
|
but the truth of the matter is.. hits wise.. you could add up ALL HER TRAFFIC in a MONTH...
and it's less than one days traffic of a FHG.
You just decided to be an ass to a phone sex operator for whatever reason.
And I've read the letters you've sent her compadres in the industry.. topsites, other companies... and I read your initial letter to her. It wasn't nice, polite...
It was outright telling her to take it down.. that it was theft..
Then when she explained her situation of purchasing from photorama.. you just strongholded her more.
I've read the letters a few times...
I get that you have every legal right to do it. I get that. I get that photorama's use was trumped by yours.. I get that...
But you weren't nice and polite in the whole ordeal.. nor did you look at the whole big picture of saturation/exposure/ and traffic...
Most content producers do that before dealing with a PSO. You didn't. You don't feel that you should or have to.. and that's cool. That's fine.
Like I said a 20 posts ago. Lesson learned.