Quote:
Originally Posted by axc
Again, you guys don't have all the facts in regards to how the usage of the content was in violation.
Everyone is making assumptions based on the first post of this thread which does not accurately reflect the reason that the license was revoked.
|
WTF does any of that have to do with my reply?
Their question was about using content in a way that was not covered in their license. That in itself is against the rules. Why do I need to know more about the situation when I'm already siding with you or whoever it is that the content came from?