|
Where is the proof that the attorney didn't actually save their asses from certain convictions with stiffer penalties?
I mean, if they were going into the case with some skeleton that was mildly related it might blind the jury enough to convict without evidence. That then sets a precedent to other courts that they can convict on that amount of evidence. In other words, their guilty pleas might actually be saving everyone else's ass.
But, I don't know those facts. I'm just saying that the facts are not clear from this post.
|