Quote:
Originally Posted by DamageX
What if they were guilty?
|
why does that matter? the concerns expressed in this thread are less about the individual clients who plead guilty and more about how it affects everyone else. its their fault precedence now exists that can be used against us all because they were unwilling to fund a lengthy court battle against a corrupt government with limitless resources. instead of pleading guilty, which most posting in this thread would have done, those assholes should of sold everything they own to help OUR cause. right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony404
An example I met with a adult attorney, he told me if you are my client and shit happens. I will defend you, we will figure out the money. I wont leave you hanging. So with him I would owe him for the rest of my life but he would defend me.Where someone else could say I need every dime upfront or I go no further pleading guilty is your best bet. Now in both of the cases its their right but a attorney is judged by his track record.
I quote the movie the verdict "We aren't paid to do our best, we are paid to win."
|
as i said in a previous post, ive dealt with a lawyer who obviously wasnt qualified to represent me but still wanted my money to plea. i found someone else who could do the job and it was done right. why not blame the clients for accepting this lawyers advice instead of getting a second opinion? or a 5th? 10th? i know if i were in the position these people were in id call every lawyer i could find until i found the one that was qualified to HELP ME protect MY RIGHTS.