gideongallery - you're a moron.. You're taking examples that aren't even similar in order to make your argument.. You're also creating "loop holes" out of thin air in order to make your argument.
Even IF the TOS says it's to go to "everyone", in that case the SP has selected the recipient which means they no longer adhere to the Safe Harbour provisions. Once you've established this, then everything else doesn't matter since they fail pretty much every other provision.. i.e. if they then use that material to generate search engine traffic which they benifit from financially.
The rest of your twisted arguments are all just the typical criminal way of spinning things to make themselves appear "legal" when they clearly are not. It's clear you side with the criminals with your arguments.
|