ScriptWorkz

Only if coded improperly, every page i code in xhtml / css for a client renders the same across all major relevant browsers. That's what i've been telling you. There might of been major issues in the past but it's came a long way, it's not hard to get things to work right across browsers. Other then the box model, their mostly the same, there are a few other little quirks, but i hate to tell you box model display issues your most likely harping about effect tables too, just not as much because you have all those extra attributes and crap forcing them not too.

Your own site could easily be accomplished with a few divs and some background images, instead it's like 6 or 7 tables full of tr's and td's and crap to muddle the works.

Don't be afraid of change to the point it cripples your innovation. Using semantic markup and css to style / position things open the doors to alot of shit you can't use tables for, and are a reliable (yes, i said reliable, i don't care how many times you spout off about display problems, because i know from experience that that is from bad coding, not some insurmountable obstacle facing css) alternative to the ways of the past.

I used to use alot of tables before, i understand it's EASIER to lay shit out with them if you don't know css, and i used to make alot of the same arguments you do, but i was wrong.

Take it for what you want man, if you wanna keep believing that table-less layouts are evil and your tables are the best solution go right ahead, anyone with any sort of sense can see that's clearly not the case anymore. At the end of the day it's your damn business, run it how you want to.

As for your intended insult at the end, i do know alot, i'm an expert with php, xhtml, css, javascript and have various other skills. I know i'm right on this subject, regardless of how delusional you are, so your gonna have to find someone else to fight with i'm done.

For the question about the validation. It's fixed ;) all validates now, so there, no hate