View Single Post
Old 09-15-2008, 05:58 AM  
Joe BrainCash
Confirmed User
 
Joe BrainCash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boy, life is difficult...
Posts: 2,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash View Post
I just heard a bit of the new Queen album that is about to come out. It is the same band but with Paul Rodgers on vocals. He has been touring with Queen for years now and I have always liked Paul Rodgers's voice with Bad Company, etc. Still, it doesn't really feel like Queen without Freddie's voice.

Can a band like Queen really be Queen without Freddie? What about other bands that reform with part of the original lineup?
Freddie was 50% of Queen ( at least)> It's not Paul Rodgers fault that Freddie can't be replaced.. If you think INXS singer Michael Hutchense is irreplacable, imagine a pure talent and king of the stage like Freddie Mercury... But Paul is an ok singer...

The very best scenario for Queen: the new album is so good that people will forget for one moment Freddie is not the singing voice.. Kind of like Van Halen with Sammy Hagar... it's the closest thing to the real deal.. Hope I made sense...
__________________
[email protected]
ICQ: 394.549.466



Joe BrainCash is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote