View Single Post
Old 10-03-2008, 07:29 PM  
Sin_Vraal
Confirmed User
 
Sin_Vraal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Net Money View Post
I never said they went down for being cheap, I was inferring that with their business model of being a cheap host and opperating at a tiny profit margin if even that, that they don't have shit for resources to to even think about fighting a legal battle with Microsoft or the Attorney Generals office. Also YES their customers are cheap, thats why they choose to go with a bottom of the barrel host rather than a quality host for a few more bucks.
I somehow doubt that any company in this thread who was in their position, using your own profits would have been able to stand up to microsoft/washington state. Of course that being said... most sane people would come to an agreement with them.

You might make 10-15/mbit more than they did, but dont forget they sold 200,000 megabits more than you (literally). if they made ONLY $1/mbit per server (which I'm betting they made more than that) they still ownz you.
__________________
"Youjizz: Henry, Thanks to you 1 in 150 people online at any given time are jerking off on my websites"

Swift Communications -- UU net / Sprint / level 3 / savvis / Gblx

Quad Core SaS HDD 1000mbits dedicated bandwidth $2500

AmySpears! Amy getting fucked in the ass and getting choked on a chain! -- Devil Bucks!

skype: henry.goss
ICQ: 5.6.4.8.0.9.8.6
Sin_Vraal is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote