10-21-2008, 06:55 PM
|
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 30,984
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
No, they support what we have "now"... which is not having a net neutrality law because we already have several laws that regulate different aspects of the Internet, already making it neutral and safe to grow. Giving us, net neutrality.
Adding a Net Neutrality law, the actual law they are trying to pass. Will hand the rights to regulate to the FCC. Lots of people seem to think, this will 'add more security' to our already good system.
That's the big thing, the law isn't clean and clear, we already have laws that regulate. Two times now it has been kicked back.
Thinking it's making it safe of regulation is stupid, when you are handing the control the FCC.
|
how much power could they have? outside the united states i mean
|
|
|