Quote:
Originally posted by BRISK
So what you're saying is we should all just work in teen content?
|
No just that it works best for us.
Quote:
Originally posted by andi_germany
Fetish is mostly done by people who are into that fetish. Those people shoot their own content because they actually know exactly what is needed for that particular kink. So it's clear that mainstream goes best but I would say that you would be able to sell fetish content for as higher price.
|
I would agree with you for the small niche sites. A guy putting up a fetish because he loves it is always going to have a better understanding of it than someone doing it for the money.
But what about the shavings sets, we shot shaving sets for 10 years and we do them well. There are "Shaving" magazines that are 50% our content. Yet it does not sell on the net. Hairy does not sell on the net but flies out in mags.
A lot of the fetish sites think they should pay the same for a fetish set as we charge for a teen set.
Quote:
Originally posted by ElectricGirl
What I still don't understand is why "porn for women" seems to be a niche...
Works for me, I'm trying to fill that niche... do any of you target women visitors? If so, how? And, are you getting any results?
|
We have solo guy material, this sells to magazines for $1,000 a set. On the net 2-3 sales. Why? Not enough sites aimed at women, probably because woman close their eyes to masturbate. Thankfully men need to open them.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Sex appeal is 50% what you've got
and 50% what people think
they can get. "
-Sophia Loren
Slight correction