Originally Posted by Peter Romero

Where is the lighting truck on a porn set? Exactly... it's not there.

Quit blaming the quality of the encoding on the computer or the editor and start blaming it on the lighting. The clip you posted was in full sun. The film granules (in this case pixels) are bigger - the less light there is - the oposite is lots of light filling out all the info on your HD tapes = High definition. But take out that light and demand the same detail, and have everyone bouncing around in the horizontal Mambo and you loose the affect that you were looking for with HD. That is why SD looks better in lower light - hence - a porno shot inside with all the windows drawn and lit with low output (miniscule compared to mainstream) lights - and lots of movement.

I've got alot to learn about editing and encoding but I do know alot about lighting and photography - the graphing of light if you speak Latin. The graphing of light... not fast moving unlit images in the dark.

I used to do lighting for mainstream movie sets - we are talking about 3-10 Semi trucks FULL of lights, ballasts, reflectors, flags, generators, and wires thick as snakes. Too bad we can't close down streets and get some 10K's out to light a set... no-one would ever complain about HD looking muddy ever again.