Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
yeah, totally.. it doesn't really make a shit what you set to bold.
I love it though, I comment you on how he got his money and that it was being spent on his election. Do you comprehend this is what you said, but I gave an explanation?
I'm sure everyone here, clearly, understands the relation of how well Obama speaks and how much money he spent over the 04 candidates. I mean come on, just read that - doesn't that just stand out as a totally logical compassions? You know, let's just focus on your comment like you want.. since it rings right up at the top of SMRT things to say.
|
Yeah what I was responding to doesn't matter. I guess if you just quote people and then make a statement that has nothing to do with what they were saying like you; then yes, it doesn't matter.
Somebody says this
"Lesson learned in this race is once again if you have good speaking skills in the USA you can pretty much get anywhere"
and I say
"
Lets not forget that he has spent more money on this election then both Bush and Kerry combined spent in the '04 election."
It shouldn't have been hard for an adult who speaks english to see that I was pointing out that it wasn't just Obama's oratory skills that helped him but also the amount of money he raised and spent. Sorry if you didn't pick up on that
and you replied with
"Or we could look at it the correct way and say, the people gave Obama more money than Bush and Kerry combined for the purpose of running for president, so logically he would spend more too."
Correct way? Logically spend more? What does any of that have to do with what I said? Did I say Obama didn't raise more money? No. Did I say he shouldn't have spent the money he raised? No
So what fantasy post were you replying to again?
You go sparky
