Darkland

My point is, if you don't think that article is against gays, your comprehension skills suck.

"Another fraud on the ballot this year is gay "marriage." Why is it fraud? Pretty clear to me by this a one alone where his beliefs lie.

"The real issue is whether marriage should be redefined— and, if for gays, why not for polygamists? Why not for pedophiles?" Hmmm, sounds like to me he is lumping gays within the same company as pedophiles.

"Gays were on their strongest ground when they said that what they did was nobody else's business. Now they are asserting a right to other people's approval, which is wholly different." This one is quite obvious as well...

"None of us has a right to other people's approval." No one says gays want "approval"

The whole article comes off to me that gays have no right to even ASK for their rights in society let alone have the right to even expect to be allowed to marry.

Law and definitions within those laws change meaning all the time with no one ever batting an eye. But lets really only care about it when a law tied to religious dogma gets challenged. I find the hypocrisy of our society almost shameful. Lets make sure we take God out of the schools, anthems, etc. when it suits us, but if a gay couple wants married then the God they wanted to cut out now vitalizes their moral compass.

If you can not see this author is not in favor of gay marriage and the hypocrisy of it maybe you should just stop thinking and study my avatar.

__________________


"The towers are gone now, reduced to bloody rubble, along with all hopes for Peace in Our Time, in the United States or any other country. Make no mistake about it: We are At War now -- with somebody -- and we will stay At War with that mysterious Enemy for the rest of our lives." H.S.T. 09/12/01