Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
Last time I heard 2257 it was over turned in the in the 6th circuit, so the ball was tossed back into the hands of the govt, to decided if and how they would continue.
That judgment only technically counts for Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee, but it's unlikely any cases would be brought forward on 2257 violation or would records be checked elsewhere because of that ruling. This happened about the time Alberto Gonzales got in hot water and was fired.
I assume with him getting his ass kicked out of town and the judgment against them in the 6th circuit that 2257 has been at least temporally sidelined, but of course we will never know until the govt makes the next move. While Obama is surely not going to make the FBI's top priority internet porn like it was with Bush/Gonzales no elected official is ever really a friend of porn.
Just because Obama is less likely to do the same kind of drastic things as the Bush admin, doesn't mean we are safe. The net is the wild wild west and the govt, regardless of whom is involved will want to control it and of course it will be done to protect the children or make us safe.
|
That sums up what is my current understanding of the status. In other words as it stands now only primary producers have to keep 2257 documents, right?