Quote:
Originally Posted by DeanCapture
I highly doubt that ATK (or any other program for that matter) would be forced to pay for content that they never ordered or didn't want...based on a post here at GFY. I don't think Kim would have any issues telling someone he's not paying for something that he didn't order or does not want.
|
Exactly.
I doubt many will be shooting for ATK for "payment on delivery" in the future. Those who do are welcome. Of course ATK should not be commissioning so much either. Let's cut the BS and talk straight, clearly ATK cannot afford to pay and have been avoiding paying some. Even when pushed they can only do a payment plan.
Whose fault is it they ordered content they could not afford, the buyer or seller?