Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Exactly.
I doubt many will be shooting for ATK for "payment on delivery" in the future. Those who do are welcome. Of course ATK should not be commissioning so much either. Let's cut the BS and talk straight, clearly ATK cannot afford to pay and have been avoiding paying some. Even when pushed they can only do a payment plan.
Whose fault is it they ordered content they could not afford, the buyer or seller?
|
Another version of the story COULD also be that ATK is working on some big projects (mentioned earlier in the thread), the content was misplaced (mentioned earlier in the thread) so the invoices was disregarded (problem with communication, mentioned earlier in this thread), for whatever reason it may be ATK might not have the time to review all the content right away (I'm guessing it is not a small order) so they agree to pay ½ "upfront" rigth away and the rest once they reviewed and approved the content.
We are getting close to year-end, especially bigger companies needs to handle their tax-writeoffs, employees go on vacation, likely there is more than just 1-2 companies that need to revise their structures etc etc etc
Whatever the reason is congrats to the winners and good to see things are being worked out
