Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo
Paul is hardly a Republican these days. He's stated the only reason he is a part of the party is because the laws are so schewed against 3rd party candidates.
But you're correct. He would not have gone after obscenity prosecutions and would have vetoed any bills to regulate the industry. The only thing that would have been bad though is the fact he'd appoint strict constructionist judges which are not good for the industry.
|
what?
Strict constitutionalists are GOOD for the industry
Quote:
|
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
|